![]() A posteriori, if no temperature increase is reported, the calculation has not become more difficult, while, if a temperature increase is indeed reported, it was then a good choice to include the viscous heating into the calculation. Its first effect is of course the introduction of an additional non-linear term while the corresponding increase of calculation time would often remain marginal. In a way, viscous heating can therefore always be asked unless one definitely wants to run an isothermal case. A general comment: For flows of highly viscous materials, temperature increase can be usually expected. We have indeed rho.Cp.Q.deltaT = total dissipated power, this allows evaluating the average temperature increase. ![]() – If the flow domain is surrounded by thermally insulated walls except at the entry and exit, energy balance can be used for estimating the temperature increase. If viscous heating is incorporated, this will lead to a temperature increase which can be viewed as an upper-limit of the expected temperature increase that would actually be observed under normal conditions. There were three endings to Mass Effect 3 in the original version: Control the Reapers, Synthesize all organic and synthetic life, and Destroy all synthetic life. Just read all the notes there are in the editor before changing something. All what counts is the Total Military Strength, and here you need, as Cliffme1ster rightly said 7800 points to be on the save side. A save editor for Mass Effect Trilogy Features This software is similar to Gibbed's save editors (and forks) but adds a lot of stuff. Download ME2 save editor: On download save that is possibly close to your choices, then open it in save editor and there you'll be able to change what you want. I always tried changing this value to 8k, and same issue. viscosity) is omitted, one obtains a decoupled system. The Save editor that is working for the old and new games does the maths based on the old games, but as said, it is not of interest anymore. I ran a save edit program and EMS is at 2.8k, which makes sense as no MP means 50 of 5.6k (my TMS). – On the basis of a similar calculation where temperature dependence of parameters (e.g. Instead, one can suggest two relatively simple approaches. The post-calculation of total dissipated power already gives an indication but the resulting effect depends on the amount of material involved and on physical parameters. How can one quickly estimate the importance or relevance of viscous heating and its influence/effect on a flow without performing too much calculations? This would be useful to know whether viscous heating has to be incorporated into the calculation or not.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |